Thread:CakeBuu/@comment-34110427-20190731203448/@comment-39840927-20190731210055

I have to agree with both Pash and Deity on this one. While I really like their cards, I think some of the judgements given by Killer was not only rushed, but constucted poorly.

My own card's animation was critised because it's animated.

"The animation is fine although the aura moves a lot, I recommend that you do not move so much, it looks something weird and takes away some of ... magic!"

This essentially, at least to me, especially since it wasn't clarified afterwards but instead was moved to some minor critique, meant to me that my choice of design with my card's animation was bad because it was because it moved "a lot". I would like for either the judgement of that to at least be reviewed a little more, since I'm not sure what "it moved a lot" means and how that is bad.

As for Pash and Deity's card judgements:

Killer's Judgement of Deity's card was, and I quote:

"You always stand out over others! You are literally a Deity!

I love everything here!!!, The Art, The Renders, The Pasive, The Super Attack, ALL!!!

Do I have to give more words to describe this wonder???"

I would have to reply to this and say yes, because the fact that there is no specification in the judgement, flagerantly given First Place, comes across as very clearly rushed with judgement.

What about the Art and Render is good for Killer? What about the Passive and Super Attack is good? These aren't answered at all. It doesn't tell Deity what he did right, what he could improve on, but also doesn't tell anyone else in the competition what about their own cards could be improved to be on-par with Deity's card.

Killer's Judgement of Pash's card was, and, again, I quote:

"Uff ... Renders can be improved in many ways just like Thumbs (the thumbs don't need a lot of work, they're really good)

I have to admit that the arts are not all bad, it seems to me that it transforms somewhat late and its passive in SS2 does not seem very strong, although in SS4 it is much better, the super attacks I see them well ...

Although I see that you made a small mistake, which could have been simply that you did not realize, is that the card says that your Maximum SA is 1/10 when it should be 1/20

I think it can be improved, although it doesn't stop you from being a great card"

Firstly, I think for judging, a level of using full terms for certain parts of a card should be kept, considering I didn't know if "Renders can be improved in many ways just like Thumbs (the thumbs don't need a lot of work, they're really good)" refers to the thumbs of the character's render or the Thumbnails themselves. There's also the factor of "The thumbnails can be improved, but they're really good" being a judgement, which is like saying "this card art can be improved, but the card art is good. It doesn't really work as a judgement.

The Passive critique, I can get behind. Everyone has their own idea on how a card can be good in use. One thing, however, is the idea that a critique that is levelled against an otherwise highly rated card is that the template doesn't show 1/20 as an SA amount but instead shows 1/10. Now, personally, and I'm guessing this is the same with Pash, I don't know how to change that from 1/10 to 1/20. There's nothing in the Tutorial section of the Wiki, its not automatically in the template's options. So the major critique of Pash's card, at least per this paragraph, is something uncontrollable by Pash.

Finally, he repeats my previous point of "This card can be improved, but it's a great card". How is that an acceptable judgement? I find a lot of cards on the competition can be great, but just because its not a card I want to rate higher than others, I wouldn't state "This card can be improved, but it is great".

I wouldn't have written this reply if it didn't affect me too. The critique of my card is questionable, to me at least, but the critique of other cards does not serve to inform me on how to improve my own cards, and, from this post, I'm guessing it doesn't serve Pash's or Deity's idea of judgement and ways to improve either. How am I supposed to improve if the deciding factor of the competition was a single sentence and, as it stands, at least for me, confusing sentences that contradict themselves.

I can understand if Killer's first language isn't English, but I don't think that's an excuse to rush judgement. I would have preferred to wait for AMagicalCat, just because then it doesn't appear rushed for judgement to be concluded on the day it is supposed to begin.