Thread:Rodamaty Geass/@comment-39840927-20190813225755/@comment-39840927-20190813232028

"Conclusions : it's a really interesting Card, I'd like to use it, it's just a shame that it doesn't have an ATK & DEF buff outside of the nuking or facing a "World Tournament" Category, enough rare in addition ...

My vote is: 8/10"

I undersand this, but then you go to Zwaka's card and put:

"Conclusions: This Card it's very very good and it's quite balanced for being an LR!

My vote is: 7,5/10"

I'm just a little confused on how I could get 8/10, Zwaka gets 7.5/10, but you give Zwaka the points. I'd understand if maybe you had given him 8/10 and me 7.5/10 because of the reason you concluded with your judgement of my card, but your conclusion rates my card better than Zwaka's out of ten.

I believe Zwaka deserves points for his entry, I really do, but I'm really confused on how you could rate his lowers than mine then give him points over mine? I think that, just to make this less confusing, you could swap my 8/10 and Zwaka's 7.5/10 around? I know that puts hassle on you to edit, but it just makes it so I understand that there's a difference between my card and Zwaka's card, in terms of your rating system, that rewards him your points.