Thread:CakeBuu/@comment-31126743-20190808131010/@comment-34520703-20190908124403

What is literally the point of writing all of that?

You both dont even bother to throughly read.

The first line of my response was "No. How else will you win a war if your country is divided?'"

But you go on to type something like this : " The purpose of uniting his country may have been to "Go to war and make a Dominant Race", but do you think he would have been able to have done that without UNITING HIS COUNTRY, AKA SAVING IT, FROM BEING BROKEN? "

Does a divided country not mean broken?

Never did I say Trump and Hitler were the same. I said they were similar, and I EVEN explained how they were similar. He gave people a common enemy. You walk down the streets of new york you hear people blaming mexicans and arabs for liberal problems.

Yet you still go on to walk something like this:  "Common Enemy" is not a good enough reason to compare the idea that Hitler wanting to KILL THE JEWS and Trump wanting to DEPORT ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS are the same thing.

I even linked google defintion of words and you still somehow manage to try to strawman and fail at it.

PLEASEEEE, stop responding if you're not going to throughly read.

Matter of a fact, stop responding at all.

"Also, can we lock this threat now? This is continuing for no good reason."

Unless you're also a hypocrite? Because asking to lock a threat because its continuing for no good reason then commenting on it, would mean you're a hypocrite by defintion.

Defintion of hypocrite : https://www.google.com/search?sxsrf=ACYBGNTeOPqacxuEOUf0M45r2grD7mJzsg%3A1567946563594&ei=Q_d0XfH2I8W6ggeJxrXgCA&q=hypocrite&oq=hypocri&gs_l=psy-ab.3.1.35i39j0l2j0i67l4j0l3.13942.14614..15540...0.1..0.77.487.7......0....1..gws-wiz.......0i71j0i131.msAJ9wRuUdM