Thread:CakeBuu/@comment-34110427-20190731203448/@comment-27996636-20190731211537

BladerusX wrote: I'd say that Killer saying that a render shading issue that almost changes the identity of the card is non-important, while a small change from 1/20 to 1/10 max SA is improtant is hypocritical to say the least. The first sentence with the thumbs saying that they need a lot of work, but are somehow already really good is also nonsensical. He also pays no attention whatsoever to the stats and how they work with SSJ2 Goku's Passive Skill, which compensates for how simple and short it is. He also did NOT point out what he found bad about the card arts, therefore he shouldn't be able to label them as "not all bad" if he finds no issues with them, but if he found some, then he should at least list them in his judgement to let Pash know what is wrong with the arts and why he got a Fake Badge. He also doesn't mention a thing about the Active Skill and how it works with SSJ4 Goku's Passive. Right now, this all points to the fact that Killer not only rushed his judging, but based it off of his relationship with Pash. I, as a fellow judge, want him to either revisit the whole Competition and actually put work into his judgements, as well as be 100% objective about it, or swap places with someone else who has judged in the past and that we know is capable of judging a major Competition like this, so with someone like TofuDB. I think having opposite opinions on cards will make the competitions more interesting. I wouldn't like it for all the Judges to vote 1st for the same card each time (unless tottally obvious that they should win).

I agree with killer on this occasion, the shading does not fit with Dokkan battle card style, neither is it a more favourable style to others. The effort put in to shading the card can become tottally void if the Judge simply does not like the style or outcome of it.